منابع مشابه
Dialectical responses to questions about dialectical thinking.
Debate about our article on culture and dialectical thinking (Peng & Nisbett, September 1999) exemplifies a thousand-yearold Confucian saying: If the participants in an intellectual discourse have different understandings about the topic in question, then the conversation will surely get difficult. Being the perpetrators who opened this Pandora's box, we feel obligated to clarify some of the co...
متن کاملA Dialectical Method to Classify Alzheimer's Magnetic Resonance Images
It is largely known that a great amount of current methods of analysis in image analysis and processing is based on parametric statistics. Alternatively, several approaches in Computational Intelligence, and particularly in Evolutionary Computation, are inspired by biology and other social-based sciences, like the ones based on the movement of flocks and birds, particularly particle swarm optim...
متن کاملArgumentation structures that integrate dialectical and non-dialectical reasoning
Argumentation concepts have been applied to numerous knowledge engineering endeavours in recent years. For example, a variety of logics have been developed to represent argumentation in the context of a dialectical situation such as a dialogue. In contrast to the dialectical approach, argumentation has also been used to structure knowledge. This can be seen as a non-dialectical approach. The To...
متن کاملTernary Dialectical Informatics
Modern binary informatics with its so-called ―classical‖ two-valued logic admits to create an artificial intellect and suppresses the natural intellect of students and other thinking people. Logic that based on dogmatic law of the excluded middle is incompatible with dialectical principle of opposition coexistence. Such logic is deprived of fundamental logical relation – the content consequence...
متن کاملNew Dialectical Rules ForAmbiguity
A set of ten rules is proposed for dealing with problems of ambiguity when interpreting a text of argumentative discourse. The rules are based on Grice's pragmatic rules for a collaborative conversation and on principles and maxims used to deal with ambiguity in interpreting legal and religious writings. The rules are meant to be applied to a given argument used in a given case, and to resolve ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Mind
سال: 1898
ISSN: 0026-4423,1460-2113
DOI: 10.1093/mind/vii.26.233